Chrishall Hearth Tax

(Picture above: the old brewhouse at Gents Farm, now Broad Green Farm).

Forasmuch as nothing conduceth more to the peace and prosperity of a nation, and the protection of every single person therein, than that the public revenue thereof may be in some measure proportioned to the public charges and expenses, we therefore, your Majesty’s most loyal and obedient subjects the Commons assembled in Parliament, having duly considered the premises, do give and grant unto your most excellent Majesty, your heirs and successors, the rate and duties hereinafter mentioned, and do most humbly beseech your Majesty that it may be enacted, and be it enacted … that from and after the five and twentieth day of March in the year of our Lord God one thousand six hundred and sixty and two every dwelling and other house and edifice, and all lodgings and chambers in the Inns of Court, Inns of Chancery, colleges and other societies that are or hereafter shall be erected within the kingdom of England, dominion of Wales and town of Berwick-upon-Tweed (other than such as in this Act are hereafter excepted and declared), shall be chargeable, and by his present Act be and are charged, with the annual payment to the king’s Majesty, his heirs and successors, for every fire-hearth and stove within every such house, edifice, chambers and lodgings as aforesaid, the sum of two shillings by the year, to be paid yearly and every year at the Feast of St. Michael the Archangel [1. 29 September] and the Feast of the Annunciation of the blessed Virgin St. Mary[2. 25 March], by even and equal portions, the first payment thereof to be paid upon the Feast day of St. Michael the Archangel which shall be in the year of our Lord one thousand six hundred and sixty and two…

And so it was that the inhabitants of Chrishall in 1662 heard that they were going to have to pay a tax on every hearth in their house.  Finding at least another two shillings for tax in 1662 was obviously not good news and must have been a struggle for some people, but the good news for us is that it means there are records from this time.  They are sketchy, just showing a name and the number of hearths but it’s another clue to add to the history of the village at that time.  The church records were just starting so we have the first few births, marriages and deaths being officially recorded and here the curtain of time is parted just a little more to start to reveal what the houses were like of the people who were coming to church.

Some of the names that appear here persist through the years.  Coleman, Greenhill and Potterell; Abrahams and James are all familiar.  I think we can probably take some of the first names into a more known style: ‘Johes’ I think would be John, ‘Robtus’, Robert, ‘Willus’, William for example.  But please correct me if I am wrong there.

Here are the Hearth Tax records for Chrishall from the first collection in 1662 and the Michaelmas return of 1670. The 1670 return was viewed by John Warren, Collector and John Southey, Constable.

Surname, FirstnameNumber of Hearths 1662Number of Hearths 1670Notes
Abraham Franciscus11
Abraham Johes1
Allin Edwards1Receives alms therefore discharged by certificate
Aylett Johes2
Beale Thomas11?Thomas Breake with one chimney in 1670 – possibly the same person
Blowse Thomas43Name spelt Blowes
Botterell Willelmus4
Brice Stephus1
Chapman vid1
Chessey Thomas3
Coldham — vid1Widow
Coldham Robtus3
Coleman Ricus2
Coleman Robtus22
Coleman Roger22Name spelt Coeman
Cross Jeremia1
Deadman Johannes2
Debnam Johes3
Dellowe Johannes1
Doegood Johes1
Freeman Thomas1Receive alms and therefore discharged by certificate
Fortescue Robtus3
Fortescue Robtus3
Foscatt Willelmus3
Gibbs Franc1
Greenhall Franc2Receives alms therefore discharged by certificate
Greenehill Seth1
Griffin – vid1
Hawkes Edwardus3
Hopper vid2Widow. Receives alms and therefore discharged by certificate
Hopper Ricus2
James Johes Ar520Name listed as Johannes James miles. Is 20 a misprint?!
Jegins Thomas1
Johnson Robertus3
King – vid12‘vid’ means Widow. There are two entries for ‘King – vid’ on the 1670 – one with 1 hearth and one with 2 hearths
King Robtus3
Lambert Johes2
Lucas Johes22
Marshall Willus11Name spelt Willelmas
Mathew Johes24Name spelt Johannes Mathews
Miles Ricus44Name spelt Ricardus Mills
Miller Johes1
Miller Johes1
Morell Stephanus3
Mowle Willus4
(Mowle) ‘Idem Johes Mowle in vac domo’37
Moule Johannes’3
Moyses Jacobus1
Page Willus1
Parker Johes1
Parker Johannes1Receives alms therefore discharged by certificate
Pluckrose Mathews1
Potterell Henr sen3
Potterell Henr jun45?There is a Henricus Bottell with 5 chimneys – could this be the same person?
(Potterell, Henr) Idem in duabus vac domi bus2
Potterell Johes11?Name spelt Johannes Botterell
Read Georgius1
(Read) Idem Georgius3
Rowley Johannes5
Rowley Michael5
Runnam Willus11?There is a Willelmus Rusted with 1 hearth on the 1670 and I wonder if this is the same person.
Rutland Stephus1
Scott Johes11
Shearman Franc8
Sherman Roger8
Smith vid2
Smith Thomas1
Stern Thomas33Name spelt Thomas Stane
Stock Johes5
(Stock) Idem Johes in Cottagis1
Sutton Robtus2
Thorne Willus22
Wattson Georg1
Watson Johes22Name spelt Johannes Wattson
Wattson Johannes2Receives alms therefore discharged by certificate
Watson Willus1
Woodcock Johes1
Woodcock Thomas1
No. of households: 5839

Relief from the Hearth Tax came 27 years later in 1689 when the King graciously “… having been informed that the revenue of Hearth Money was grievous to the people, was pleased by his gracious message sent to the Commons assembled in Parliament to signify his pleasure either to agree to a regulation of it or to the taking it wholly away….”.  It was abolished and hearths were once more genuinely ‘heart warming’!  However the Window Tax was on the horizon…

What do we know about any of these people?

John Lucas: owner of 2 chimneys. Probably the village constable. You can read more about him here: John Lucas, Village Constable.

John Stock: owner of 5 chimneys, John Stock was obviously a man of means. We have two burial records for a  John Stock buried 2 May 1706 – possibly the 5 chimney man? – and another John Stock buried 18 June 1718, maybe his son? But that’s all supposition. No proof as yet. Interestingly though there is a William Stock, born in Chrishall, who was admitted to Pembroke College (then Pembroke Hall) in Cambridge on 5 July 1664.


Comments

2 responses to “Chrishall Hearth Tax”

  1. Alan Knight Avatar
    Alan Knight

    An excellent article and most helpful to me in my researches, Am I right in thinking the number after the name is the number of hearths in the village? Three of my ancestors that I know of feature in the list, ROBERT FORTESCUE, 03, JOHN LUCAS, 02, and JOHN MILLER, 01. I suppose this indicates their wealth at this time? So SHERMAN ROGER, 08 would have been the wealthiest? I think my FORTESCUE forefather came from a “Recusant” family so would not be popular among the village population, or is this just me being too clever?

    1. Rosemarie Gant Avatar
      Rosemarie Gant

      Hello Alan – I find the Hearth tax records fascinating – the fact that we know something about the people and their houses in the village from so long ago. Yes the number is the number of hearths and yes it would indicate their wealth. So yes Roger Sherman would presumably have been the wealthiest. I’m not sure whether your Recusant relation would have been unpopular. It was the large number of people refusing to attend church that led to the building of the chapel in the village (we really need to get that history written up as it is another fascinating story) – so I think he was probably in good company!

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Chrishall Village History

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading